
We feel primary care can be greatly improved if more emphasis is placed on the medical school environment. Our health care reform, then, addresses an underlying cause to the imbalance between primary and specialty care services, which has contributed to an imbalance in the ratio of generalists to specialists (Shi & Singh, 2008). Our reform proposes solutions to help influence the career choices of medical students and physicians already in residency programs (Monegain, 2009). We feel primary care physicians should have effective incentives and be eligible to receive additional funding and support (Monegain, 2009). We feel much can be done to make the medical school environment friendlier to primary care, thus improving all aspects of primary and outpatient care. We suggest the following proposals:
1. Medical schools should devote significant sections of the curriculum to general and ambulatory experiences.
2. Student should also be exposed to strong generalist role models and mentors. There should be an increased emphasis on teaching general internal medicine.
3. Generalists should also be offered prominent positions within academic medicine, as chairpersons, deans, and committee members.
4. Medical schools should strengthen their primary care departments by improving research and fellowship training programs.
5. Financial incentives such as loan forgiveness should be established to encourage medical students to choose generalist careers (AAFP, 2010; Annual Residency Completion Survey 2008).

6. There should be an increase in the number of primary care tracks.
7. Most importantly we feel the size of subspecialty programs should be downsized. This can be done by limiting the number of applicants into specialty fields (Petersdorf & Goitein, 1999).

(AAFP, 2010; Michael Munger, M.D., examines a patient at his medical office in Overland Park, Kan.)
We feel the medical school environment can act to reduce the disparities among primary care and specialty care physicians by implementing our seven proposals. Many factors will be changed, primarily the medical education programs themselves. However, we do feel these changes will be cost effective for patients considering the median expenses per office-based physician visit (AAFP, 2010; Figure 1). These seven suggestions also improve access for the estimated 45 million individuals who are uninsured bringing health care closer to where people live and work (Shi & Singh, 2008). Not only does our reform improve cost and access, it will also enhance quality as primary care focuses on the person as a whole, whereas specialty care centers on particular diseases or organ systems of the body (Shi & Singh, 2008).
References
- American Academy of Family Physicians (2010) www.afp.org. Accessed 2/26/2010.
- County Health Rankings (2010) Access to Care. www.countyhealthrankings.org. Accessed 2/26/2010.
- Monegain, B. (2009, February 4). Docs say primary care physicians central to healthcare reform. Retrieved from http://www.healthcarefinancenews.com/news/docs-say-primary-care-physicians-central-healthcare-reform.
- Petersdorf, R.G., & Goitein, Lara. (1999). The Future of internal medicine. Annals of Internal Medicine, 119(11), 1130-1137.
- Rieselbach, R.E., Crouse, B.J., Frohna, J.G. (2009) Teaching Primary Care in Community Health Centers: Addressing the Workforce Crisis for the Underserved. Annals of Internal Medicine.
- Shi, L., & Singh, D. A. (2008). Delivering health care in America: a systems approach (4th ed.). Sudbury, MA: Jones and Bartlett Publishers, Inc.
I agree that an increase in primary physicians will positively impact cost and access to healthcare. However, with more medical schools possibly being added in the United States, will this help or hinder the quest for more primary care doctors? Is that your window of opportunity for your reform...implement your ideas in new medical schools around the country?
ReplyDeleteThank you for your comment! The problem is quite dynamic. We believe having more medical schools will increase the number of primary care doctors. These schools will allow qualified candidates to pursue a medical education. These candidates are probably more likely to choose a primary care career due to their history. Furthermore, a certain proportion of these students will go to primary care residencies as all schools have at least some students who pursue such interests. To really get the number needed, we encourage the development of programs to better compensate primary care providers. We also want to encourage PCP to complete administrative fellowships and pursue leadership positions.
ReplyDeleteI feel the additional medical schools could help in the quest for more primary care. Medical schools could encourage medical students to pursue careers in primary care. If primary care professionals were paid more it would be more appealing to students. Medical schools could also dedicate a portion of admissions to family medicine or other primary care careers.
ReplyDeleteI like the idea of increasing incentives and funding for potential primary care physcians in medical school. I feel that encouraging different pathways while in school would be effective, and could result in our desired outcome.
ReplyDelete